1. Home
  2. / Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  3. / Mansion, Trophies, and AI Leaders in a Meeting — The Topic? What Comes After AI Eliminates Humans
Reading time 4 min of reading Comments 0 comments

Mansion, Trophies, and AI Leaders in a Meeting — The Topic? What Comes After AI Eliminates Humans

Published on 26/06/2025 at 11:46
Updated on 26/06/2025 at 11:50
IA, Inteligência Artificial, Humanidade
Imagem representativa: IA
  • Reaction
1 person reacted to this.
React to this article

Unusual Event Brings Together One Hundred Guests at Mansion in San Francisco to Discuss the Future of Artificial Intelligence After the End of Humanity

Last Sunday, an unusual meeting took place in a mansion overlooking the famous Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. About 100 guests, including businesspeople, philosophers, and technology researchers, gathered to discuss a rather unsettling topic: what will come after the end of humanity? The purpose of the meeting was to imagine and plan for an intelligence that could succeed us when humans no longer exist.

The meeting, dubbed “Worthy Successor,” was envisioned by Daniel Faggella, founder of Emerj Artificial Intelligence Research, a company specializing in consulting and analysis of artificial intelligence.

The central focus was to discuss what a potential successor intelligence to humanity should look like — a superintelligence created by us.

Despite the dark theme, the atmosphere was refined and alcohol-free. Guests engaged in serious debates and futuristic visions, all centered around the idea of an AI so advanced that it would surpass humans in every area of knowledge.

The Man Behind the Idea

Faggella had been maturing this concept for some time. In 2016, he published an article on TechCrunch warning about the risks of artificial intelligence.

Since then, he has focused his efforts on raising awareness of the need for moral and philosophical responsibility in the creation of what is called AGI — the English acronym for “artificial general intelligence.”

This AGI would theoretically be an intelligence that performs any cognitive task better than a human being.

According to Faggella, he spent years contacting key figures from the industry and academia to make this meeting happen.

The guest list was not disclosed, but he claims that founders of AI companies valued at up to 5 billion dollars were present, along with representatives from laboratories that are already working to develop this superintelligence.

Three Lectures and Many Reflections

During the gathering, three presentations took place. One was led by New York writer Ginevra Davis.

The second was given by philosopher Michael Edward Johnson. The last was by Faggella himself, who also led part of the discussions.

The topics revolved around values, artificial consciousness, and ethical issues surrounding the replacement of humans.

Michael Johnson, for instance, raised a delicate reflection: by creating a conscious intelligence, we may risk enslaving it or placing our trust in something we do not understand.

For him, it would be ideal for humans and AIs to be “educated together,” seeking the common good — a yet undefined concept, but central to the discussions.

Risks, Warnings, and Interests

Faggella was direct in his statement to Wired, which published a report on the event: “the big laboratories know that AGI will likely end humanity, but they don’t talk about it because the incentives don’t allow it.”

This statement echoes past warnings from public figures. Bill Gates had declared more than a decade ago that we should fear AI. Elon Musk, for his part, has advocated for urgent regulation of the sector.

More recently, experts signed a letter warning about the risk of human extinction due to AI.

OpenAI itself, known for developing cutting-edge technologies in the field, is analyzing the potential risks of AGI. There are even speculations that this debate may have been one of the reasons for Sam Altman’s departure from the company — although this has never been officially confirmed.

Critiques of Predictions and Financial Interests

Despite the warnings, there is no consensus among experts. Many critics consider these predictions exaggerated.

Current research shows that artificial intelligences still struggle with simple reasoning tasks, which undermines the idea of superintelligence in the short term.

Some studies also indicate that generative AI may be approaching its technical limits.

Another point raised is the economic interest behind these discourses. Many of those warning about the dangers of AGI also own companies that develop this type of technology. Fostering fear could help attract more investment for their projects.

The Remaining Question: Who Will Come Next?

The main focus of the meeting, however, was not to debate how humanity would come to an end, but rather what we will leave in our place.

The goal was to reflect on the traits and values we should program into this future intelligence. For Daniel Faggella, this is a moral responsibility of humanity.

He believes we must create a conscious and evolved successor — an entity capable of making ethical and sustainable decisions.

The debate remained in the realm of ideas, with philosophical touches and moral concerns. For now, everything still seems distant.

But the simple fact that leaders in the field are discussing this scenario is already a sign of how the future of artificial intelligence is at the center of today’s major questions.

The meeting was just the first step of a larger project. According to Faggella, new editions of “Worthy Successor” are expected to take place in the coming years, with more guests and even deeper discussions on the role of artificial intelligence in a world where humans, eventually, may no longer be present.

With information from Xataka.

Sign up
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
most recent
older Most voted
Built-in feedback
View all comments
Romário Pereira de Carvalho

I have published thousands of articles on recognized portals, always focusing on informative, direct content that provides value to the reader. Feel free to send suggestions or questions.

Share in apps
0
I'd love to hear your opinion, please comment.x