Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
André Mendonça, STF Minister, Temporarily Established That Fuel ICMS Must Be Uniform Across All Brazilian States
The Brazilian states decided they will appeal against the decision made last Friday (the 17th) by the Supreme Federal Court (STF) minister, André Mendonça, regarding the rates of the Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS) collected on fuels. Mendonça determined temporarily that the ICMS on fuels, such as diesel, gasoline, ethanol, and GLP, must be uniform throughout the national territory.
The decision establishes that the ICMS calculation base should be set according to the average prices practiced over the last 60 days. Furthermore, states must wait a minimum period of 12 months from the first fixation to make the first adjustment of the rates, and 6 months to carry out subsequent adjustments.
Décio Padilha Discusses The Revenue Loss Caused By The STF Measure And Its Impact On State Policies
In light of this scenario, the President of the National Committee of State and Federal District Finance Secretaries (Comsefaz), Décio Padilha, declared that the STF’s decision will result in a revenue loss for the states of R$ 31 billion over a 12-month period.
-
The government will pay R$ 1.20 for each liter of diesel that Brazil imports and for the first time in history requires distributors to reveal how much they profit — those who hide their margins will face fines of up to R$ 500 million…
-
Under kilometers of water, rock, and salt, Brazil hides a colossal wealth that led an official guide from the U.S. government to recognize the country as the owner of the largest ultra-deep oil reserves in the world.
-
Iran said that the Strait of Hormuz is open, but in practice only 1 non-Iranian oil tanker managed to cross in 24 hours — before the blockade, 100 ships passed per day.
-
Petrobras completes 1,300 hours of work and 15 km of subsea lines to connect the Búzios 90 well to the P-79 — the platform is ready to produce 180,000 barrels per day and is just awaiting ANP approval.
According to the Comsefaz president, there will be serious impacts on state policies for education, health, and security, since approximately 70% of state revenues come from ICMS collection.
Padilha also highlighted that, when adding the effect caused by the approval of the bill limiting the tax rate on fuels, public transport, electricity, and telecommunications to 17%, the observed reduction in state revenues could exceed R$ 131 billion within 12 months.
He explained that ICMS revenue is earmarked, with 25% of the total going to education, 12% to health, and 25% to municipalities. Thus, the impacts will make public policies of states and municipalities unfeasible.
Padilha Advocates For The Creation Of An Equalization Account And The Vote On Tax Reform As Solutions To The Problematic Issue
According to Padilha, the increase in fuel prices is caused by the rising price of oil, which has been influenced by the war in Ukraine. In this sense, he believes that the most appropriate solution to this issue is not to reduce state taxes but to develop an equalization account with Petrobras dividends.
According to the Comsefaz president, since January, diesel prices have accumulated a 60% increase due to Petrobras’ adjustment policy. Padilha adds that, therefore, it is important to take technical paths and move away from the narrative war, in order to create a conjunctural solution that consists of the equalization account and the vote on tax reform, PEC 110, which is currently stalled in the Senate.
The injunction established by the STF was motivated by an action filed by the Attorney General’s Office (AGU) to suspend a resolution from the National Council of Fiscal Policy (Confaz) regarding the collection of ICMS. Therefore, the determined measures should remain in place until Confaz issues new rules in accordance with the guidelines defined by André Mendonça, the Supreme Minister.
It is also important to mention that the STF minister additionally determined that Petrobras must send internal documents to the STF justifying the formation of fuel prices.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!