1. Home
  2. / Logistics and Transportation
  3. / While the US Navy still relied for decades on the subsonic Harpoon and Tomahawk missiles for naval combat, the US Air Force reactivated the AGM-183A ARRW program on May 12, 2026, in an anti-ship version capable of making a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier disappear in minutes.
Reading time 6 min of reading Comments 0 comments

While the US Navy still relied for decades on the subsonic Harpoon and Tomahawk missiles for naval combat, the US Air Force reactivated the AGM-183A ARRW program on May 12, 2026, in an anti-ship version capable of making a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier disappear in minutes.

Written by Douglas Avila
Published on 20/05/2026 at 19:02
Be the first to react!
React to this article

While the American Navy has relied for decades on subsonic Harpoon and Tomahawk missiles for naval combat, the US Air Force reactivated the AGM-183A ARRW program on May 12, 2026, in an anti-ship version capable of making a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier disappear from the sea in minutes, according to a report by TWZ War Zone.

The acronym ARRW stands for Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon. The hypersonic missile is developed by Lockheed Martin and has a renewed budget of $296 million for the fiscal year 2027 for the so-called “Increment 2,” the anti-ship version.

The ARRW was canceled in 2023 after 6 partially successful tests. It now returns with a new terminal warhead capable of targeting moving targets, a data link for in-flight route updates, and architecture adapted for naval battle in the Indo-Pacific.

What the ARRW Increment 2 does differently from the original

The original version of the ARRW was designed as a strategic land-to-land weapon. The target was fixed installations such as bunkers, command-and-control, and production centers.

According to a TWZ report, the 2021 test reached a range of 600 nautical miles (approximately 1,110 km).

The Increment 2 version changes the concept. The missile gains a terminal phase seeker, capable of identifying and tracking moving targets like warships.

The function is new and critical for modern naval combat.

According to journalist Joseph Trevithick from TWZ, the in-flight data link is the second major differential.

External sensors (satellites, patrol aircraft, ships) can correct the missile’s route until seconds before impact.

In parallel, the anti-ship version maintains the 2 launch platforms. The B-52 bomber and the B-1B Lancer can carry the ARRW.

Integration with the future stealth bomber B-21 Raider is under study but not confirmed for the first production phase.

The numbers that justify the $296 million bet

The budget requested by the USAF for the fiscal year 2027 is exactly $296 million. According to the Air Force’s breakdown, this amount covers 4 main fronts until 2030.

The first front is the engineering of the anti-ship seeker, estimated at $124 million. The second is the integration of the encrypted data link, at $72 million.

The third is the production of prototypes for testing at $65 million. The fourth is final operational qualification, at $35 million.

According to Defense News, the schedule targets 3 critical milestones. First anti-ship test in 2027. Initial operational capability in 2028.

Serial production starting in 2029, with a goal of 200 missiles in the fleet by 2032.

Above all, the unit cost of the ARRW is estimated between $14 and $18 million. This is about 8 times the price of the Tomahawk Block V ($1.9 million) and 14 times the Harpoon AGM-84 ($1.3 million).

The justification is unique hypersonic capability.

Strategic bomber B-1B Lancer in flight with missiles under the fuselage in cloudy sky
USAF B-1B Lancer bomber: one of the 2 launch platforms for the ARRW Increment 2. Image: USAF release.

Technical reveal: why hypersonics change everything in naval combat

In the background, hypersonic speed reorders naval defense. Subsonic missiles like the Tomahawk fly at Mach 0.75 (about 920 km/h).

An aircraft carrier has 6 to 10 minutes to react to a launch detected at 100 km.

According to analysis by the CSIS, hypersonic missiles fly above Mach 5 (≈ 6,174 km/h). They reduce the reaction time to less than 60 seconds in the same 100 km detection scenario.

Current American naval defense systems (Aegis SM-3, SM-6, RIM-7) were designed for subsonic or medium supersonic missiles.

Only the future Glide Phase Interceptor, under development since 2023, targets hypersonic threats. The expected service entry is 2032.

In parallel, the ARRW Increment 2 takes advantage of 2 physical advantages of the hypersonic regime. The kinetic energy of the impact is dozens of times greater than conventional missiles. The low-altitude skimming trajectory avoids maritime radars.

Why the ARRW was canceled in 2023 and returned in 2026

The history of the ARRW program is turbulent. Lockheed Martin began development in 2018 with a $480 million contract. The 6 initial tests between 2021 and 2023 had mixed results.

According to Defense News, the April 2021 test was partially successful. In December 2021, a missile separation failure occurred. In 2022, the test reached Mach 5 but the accuracy was below the target.

In 2023, the budget was cut and the program canceled for Increment 1.

The turnaround began in 2025. The Pentagon identified a critical gap in long-range anti-ship missiles in the context of the dispute with China in the Indo-Pacific.

In parallel, Lockheed Martin proposed Increment 2 with significant technical changes.

Above all, the 2026 decision was influenced by 3 strategic factors. First, the growing threat of Chinese anti-ship missiles DF-21D and DF-26. Second, the increase of the Chinese naval fleet to 370 ships (versus 297 of the USN).

Third, the vulnerability of American aircraft carriers in the South China Sea.

American Nimitz-class aircraft carrier sailing in open sea with aircraft on the flight deck
Nimitz-class aircraft carrier of the USN: ARRW Increment 2 aims to protect the fleet against Chinese anti-ship missiles. Image: US Navy release.

Human reveal: the program that Mark Lewis defended for a decade

The human face of the reactivation is Mark Lewis, former Director of Defense Research at the Pentagon between 2018 and 2021. Lewis defended the ARRW since 2018 and advocated for reactivation after the 2023 cancellation.

According to official records, Lewis has a PhD in Aeronautics from MIT. He worked 23 years as a professor at the University of Maryland before going to the Pentagon.

He is now CEO of the Purdue Applied Research Institute, maintaining political influence over the program.

In parallel, the current program is led by Colonel Heath Collins of the Air Force and Steven Botwinik, vice president of hypersonics at Lockheed Martin.

The technical team brings together 320 engineers among Lockheed, USAF, US Navy, and DARPA laboratories.

On the other hand, the American hypersonic program faces internal competition. The US Navy has the Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) with first operational capability in 2025.

The US Army has the Dark Eagle in production. The 3 forces compete for a limited federal budget of $4.7 billion for hypersonics in 2026.

How the ARRW compares to the Chinese DF-21D and DF-26

The direct Chinese competitors are 2 anti-ship ballistic missiles. The DF-21D, in service since 2010, has a range of 1,500 to 2,000 km and terminal phase hypersonic speed.

The DF-26, active since 2016, reaches 3,000 to 4,000 km.

According to the CSIS, both are nicknamed “carrier killers” by the Western media. China maintains an estimated arsenal of 200 to 350 units of each model, according to the American Department of Defense analysis.

The ARRW Increment 2 has a shorter range (1,110 km) but a different strategic advantage. It can be launched from a strategic bomber operating beyond the range of Chinese defenses.

The DF-21D and DF-26 are launched from continental soil, in known fixed positions.

In parallel, Russia has the Zircon hypersonic anti-ship in service since 2022 with the Russian Navy. Estimated range of 1,000 km, Mach 8-9.

It was fired against Ukraine in 2024 in mixed attacks. Western intelligence considers the Zircon less accurate than the ARRW under development.

Hypersonic missile in test trajectory in the sky with visible long flame and clouds in the background
Hypersonic missile in test phase: ARRW Increment 2 flies above Mach 5 with in-flight data link. Image: Lockheed Martin release.

Future reveal: the schedule until serial production in 2029

The next step planned by the USAF is to complete the engineering of the anti-ship seeker by December 2026. In parallel, the first test of Increment 2 is scheduled for the second quarter of 2027.

The schedule includes 4 critical milestones until 2030. First flight test in 2027. Demonstration against simulated naval target in 2028.

Initial operational capability in 2029. Serial production starting in 2030 with 60 units annually until reaching 200 in the fleet.

According to the US Defense, the final strategic goal is to equip 2 squadrons of the B-52H and 2 squadrons of the B-1B with ARRW Increment 2 by 2032.

Each typical squadron has 12 to 18 operational aircraft. It is worth remembering the coverage of sectoral transformations in other Brazilian technological areas.

  • Announcement: May 12, 2026 (Increment 2)
  • System: AGM-183A ARRW (Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon)
  • Manufacturer: Lockheed Martin
  • FY2027 Budget: $296 million
  • Platforms: B-52H and B-1B Lancer
  • Range: ≥ 600 nautical miles (1,110 km)
  • Speed: hypersonic (above Mach 5)
  • Fleet goal by 2032: 200 missiles in 4 squadrons
Fleet of American strategic bombers at airbase with planes lined up in storage yard
USAF B-52H fleet: goal is to equip 4 squadrons with ARRW Increment 2 by 2032. Image: USAF release.

The points that still depend on operational tests

Despite the approved budget, 3 fronts still depend on practical testing. The integration of the anti-ship seeker needs to be validated against moving targets in open sea.

On the other hand, the encrypted in-flight data link needs to withstand adversary electronic interference. Finally, the unit cost needs to drop from $14-18 million to at least $8 million in serial production, so that the USAF can equip 4 squadrons within the planned budget.

The outcome of these variables defines the pace of the real implementation of American anti-ship hypersonic capability.

Sign up
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
most recent
older Most voted
Built-in feedback
View all comments
Tags
Douglas Avila

My 13+ years in technology have been driven by one goal: to help businesses grow by leveraging the right technology. I write about artificial intelligence and innovation applied to the energy sector, translating complex technology into practical decisions for industry professionals.

Share in apps
0
I'd love to hear your opinion, please comment.x