Survey Calculates Costs to Consumers Due to Bill Project in Energy Planning, with an Increase of R$ 25 Billion/Year Until 2050, Offshore Wind Farms, Coal-Fired Power Plants, Proinfa Contracts.
Luiz Barroso, former president of the Energy Research Company (EPE) and CEO of PSR, stated that the ‘jabutis’ contained in the bill project (PL) for the regulation of offshore wind farms may raise inflation and reduce the competitiveness of the industry. According to Barroso, these elements, which do not relate to the wind matrix, represent a risk for the wind sector.
The survey conducted by PSR Solutions and Consulting in Energy, presented at a meeting that brought together sector entities, showed that the jabutis present in the bill project could have significant impacts on the industry. The organizations present at the event discussed the proposed amendments and raised concerns about the effects of legislative malpractice on energy policies.
Bill in Legislative Process May Have Direct Impact on Energy Costs
According to a recent study, the proposed amendments and changes to the bill project (PL) could have a direct impact on energy costs for consumers. The additional cost is estimated to be R$ 25 billion per year until 2050, totaling R$ 658 billion over the period.
-
Saudi Arabia is building in Oxagon a US$ 8.4 billion mega green hydrogen plant with 4 GW of solar and wind energy, 5.6 million solar panels, and capacity to produce 600 tons per day, transforming the desert into one of the planet’s largest clean fuel factories.
-
Germany and Denmark will transform Bornholm into a Baltic power island, connecting 3 GW of offshore wind power to the grids of the two countries via submarine cables and turning a real island into an international energy hub.
-
Brazil discovers natural hydrogen in four states and enters the silent race that could redraw the energy transition: Petrobras has already invested R$ 20 million in studies.
-
A BRICS country surprises the world, doubles electricity generation in just 7 years, nears 9,800 MW, and becomes one of Africa’s new bets in renewable energy.
The debate surrounding the bill has raised important questions regarding competitiveness and energy planning. The Minister of Mines and Energy and the EPE have expressed concerns about legislative malpractice and its consequences for the sector.
One of the discussion points is the contracting of thermal plants using natural gas that are inflexible, which could result in a cost of R$ 155 billion. Additionally, postponing the deadline for renewable energy generators with subsidies to begin operations could lead to an additional cost of R$ 113 billion.
Critics from Experts Include Legislative Interference in Energy Planning
One of the main aspects criticized in the bill is the specific contracting for offshore wind farms in the South, with a cost of R$ 5 billion, which could affect sector competitiveness. In addition, the maintenance of coal-fired power plants and the construction of hydrogen plants are also among the questioned points.
Experts warn that the proposed measures could harm the competitiveness of the energy sector and adversely affect the end consumer. Amendments that do not pass the rigorous technical scrutiny of planning may lead to significant additional costs over time, raising concerns about the impact on energy costs for consumers.
‘Jabutis’ and Associated Costs According to the Study
- Contracting of inflexible natural gas thermal plants: R$ 155 billion
- Postponement of the deadline for renewables to begin operations with subsidies: R$ 113 billion
- Specific contracting of PCHs: R$ 140 billion
- Postponement of the deadline for MMGD to begin operations with subsidies: R$ 101 billion
- Maintenance of coal-fired power plants: R$ 92 billion
- Construction of hydrogen plant: R$ 28 billion
- Extension of Proinfa contracts: R$ 24 billion
- Specific contracting for wind farms in the South: R$ 5 billion
Source: CNN Brazil

Be the first to react!