Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
5 comments 
Challenge Puts Two 300cc Motorcycles in Identical Test to See Which One Runs More. Result Revealed Honda’s Advantage in Efficiency.
Two 300cc motorcycles were put side by side in a consumption challenge on the channel Cars with Tiago. On one side, the Yamaha MT-03. On the other, the Honda CB Twister F 300.
Both started the test with completely empty tanks. The objective was simple: to find out which one would cover more kilometers with just 2 liters of gasoline.
Before starting, the trip meters of the motorcycles were reset. This ensured that the measurement was accurate, recording exactly the distance traveled with the provided fuel.
-
Less than a Tera TSI, up to 710 km of range and charging in 9 minutes: the new BYD Song Ultra expands the Chinese brand’s bet on increasingly faster, more technological, and competitively priced electric SUVs.
-
With a 1.0 engine producing 75 hp and costing less than R$ 70,000, Fiat’s car returns to the podium as the cheapest in the country; a temporary promotion for the 2026 Like version reduces the price of the Fiat Mobi.
-
With a mild hybrid system of 48 V, 176 hp and a price of R$ 175,990 in the Sahara version, the new Jeep Renegade changes mostly on the inside, improves slightly in fuel consumption, and remains almost the same car.
-
With a 293.5 cm³ engine and a range of up to 400 km with a 14.1-liter tank, the Honda CB 300F Twister 2026 has up to 24.7 hp, an initial price of R$ 25,150, and already exceeds R$ 29,000 in the Fipe Table.
Preparation of the Motorcycles and Comparison Criteria
In preparation for the test, each motorcycle received the same 2 liters of gasoline. The riding would be at cruising speed, between 100 and 120 km/h, simulating common road use.
The idea was to understand which motorcycle could be more efficient under normal riding conditions.
An important difference between the motorcycles lies in the engine. The MT-03 is equipped with two cylinders (“two pots”), which typically delivers more performance.
In contrast, the CB Twister features only one cylinder. This difference could directly influence the test results.
Moreover, the MT-03 is known for delivering more torque and horsepower. However, these qualities can, in some cases, also increase fuel consumption.
Therefore, the curiosity lay in whether Yamaha’s extra power would justify a higher expenditure, or if Honda’s simplicity would be more efficient.
MT-03 Result: Good Average, But Higher Consumption
The Yamaha MT-03 test was the first to conclude. The motorcycle covered 51.6 kilometers with the 2 liters of gasoline. This represents an average consumption of 25.5 km per liter.
Although not a bad result for a 300cc sportbike, the performance fell short of expectations for those seeking maximum efficiency.
Still, the rider emphasized that the average was quite interesting, considering the style and purpose of the motorcycle.
The most important thing was to observe that the test maintained the established standard. The route and speed were the same for both motorcycles.
The rider also reinforced that in more aggressive usage situations, such as maximum acceleration, the MT-03 could end up delivering only 10 km per liter.
Twister Surprises and Reaches Almost 60 km with 2 Liters
In the Honda CB Twister F 300 test, the surprise was even greater.
The motorcycle managed to cover nearly 60 kilometers with the same 2 liters of gasoline. As a result, the average was around 30 km per liter.
This performance positions the Twister as more economical between the two, with an advantage of 4.5 km per liter over its rival.
For a motorcycle in the same category, this difference is significant, especially for those who use the vehicle daily and want to save on refueling.
At the end of the journey, the CB Twister also ran out of fuel, concluding the test under the same conditions as the MT-03.
Comparative Conclusion: Economy or Performance?
The test revealed that the Honda CB Twister 300 is more economical than the Yamaha MT-03 in highway use at constant speed.
The difference in consumption may seem small in absolute numbers, but it becomes relevant when evaluated in day-to-day use, especially for those covering long distances.
Therefore, for those seeking economy, the Twister proved to be the better choice. For those who prefer a motorcycle with more performance, even with a bit more consumption, the MT-03 remains a strong option.
The most important thing is that both models deliver good results within their proposals. While one prioritizes efficiency, the other focuses on performance.
And this leaves consumers with good alternatives in the 300cc market.
Que comparação é essa??? são duas motos com propostas totalmente diferentes, sem contar que a MT03 não é rival direta da Twister, a FZ25 é rival direta da Twister. Nada a ver esse **** kkkkkkk
Comparação fulera comparar uma moto mt03 com Twitter 300 de 24 pôneis com ouro sangue de 42 cavalos feita pra corre e competir com cb500f
Porque não foi incluído neste **** a Kawasaki Ninja 300?